William Jansen vs Ilija Palavestra Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: In recent months, Ilija Palavestra edges out William Jansen slightly, winning 47.11% compared to Jansen's 46.51% of points on their second serve. Could this slight edge influence the outcome?
• Return Game: Palavestra shows a stronger ability to win against opponents' second serves with 51.80%, compared to Jansen's 42.18%. On first serves, Palavestra also leads with a return success of 25.00%, versus Jansen's 23.24%.
• Pressure Situations: Under pressure, Jansen performs more consistently by saving 60.00% of breakpoints, whereas Palavestra saves 50.00%.
• Overall Performance: The win/loss record over the year is nearly identical, with Palavestra at 56.25% (9/7) and Jansen at 55.56% (10/8).
• Preferred Surface: Palavestra performs best on clay, winning 60%, while Jansen shows strength on indoor hard surfaces, also winning 60%. This match’s surface choice could be pivotal.
• Competitive Levels: Both primarily compete in the same tournament tier, with Palavestra winning slightly more matches (60.00% vs. Jansen’s 58.82%).
• Opponent Quality: Palavestra has faced tougher opponents on average, with an opponent rank of 228.63 compared to Jansen's 415.11.
• Deciding Set Ability: Jansen demonstrates superior performance in deciding sets, with a 60% win rate compared to Palavestra's 33%.
• Break Point Conversion: Palavestra has been more effective at converting breakpoints recently, with a rate of 33.33% as opposed to Jansen’s 23.81%.

Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent statistics, Palavestra holds a slight edge on second serve points and exhibits a stronger return game, especially against opponents' second serves. This advantage might contribute significantly during crucial games.

However, on dealing with high-pressure scenarios, Jansen displays greater resilience, successfully saving more breakpoints and excelling in deciding sets.

The match surface could be a decisive factor as both players perform differently under varying conditions. With Palavestra more suited to clay and Jansen favoring indoor hard courts, the chosen surface will likely play a critical role.

Considering the competitive level and Palavestra's experience against higher-ranked players, he might have a subtle upper hand in handling challenging situations.

Given these facets, while each player brings their strengths into this match, Ilija Palavestra appears more likely to secure victory due to his superior return game and opponent experience.